data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b190d/b190d175d32d6695c55a12ef50b1181b2901b9af" alt="Why CBSE Class 12 Physics Examination left college students in Pune with combined reactions | Pune Information Why CBSE Class 12 Physics Examination left college students in Pune with combined reactions | Pune Information"
As practically 44 lakh college students deal with the continuing CBSE board examinations this yr, the Class 12 Physics paper has emerged as a speaking level amongst college students and educators alike.
Whereas some discovered it “reasonably troublesome”, others described it as “prolonged and difficult”.
The Indian Categorical talked with college students and educators in Pune about their expertise with the Physics paper held on February 21.
The paper construction
The 2025 Physics examination adopted CBSE’s newest pattern paper format, with a complete of 70 marks divided throughout 5 sections. In contrast to earlier years, there was no general selection, although some questions supplied inside selections. The paper was structured as: Part A 16 multiple-choice questions (1 mark every); Part B: 5 quick questions (2 marks every); Part C: 7 questions (3 marks every); Part D: 2 case study-based questions (4 marks every); Part E: 3 lengthy reply questions (5 marks every)
Educator’s overview
“This yr’s paper maintained CBSE’s current development of testing conceptual understanding relatively than rote studying,” stated Swapnanjali Thorgule, educator at Siddhant Worldwide Faculty, Pune. “Nonetheless, what made it notably fascinating was its distinctive mixture of easy questions and people requiring deeper analytical considering which challenged many college students.”
Part-wise Evaluation
“A number of selection questions (MCQs) had been a mixture of direct and analytical questions. Whereas Fashionable Physics questions had been comparatively simpler, these from Shifting Costs and Magnetism demanded sturdy conceptual readability. The assertion-reasoning questions notably examined in-depth understanding of the ideas,” stated Malhar Shelke of Dnyanjyoti Faculty, Chikhali.
“Quick reply questions had been type of a confidence booster. The two-mark questions on elementary ideas like Younger’s double slit experiment, Threshold frequency, and others. We might full this part shortly, securing simple marks” stated Aniket Extra of Bharati Vidyapeeth Faculty, Balewadi.
Story continues beneath this advert
“Part C proved to be the litmus take a look at for conceptual understanding and was one of the crucial time-consuming, that includes derivations and circuit-based questions. Matters like Capacitors, Kirchoff’s Legislation and Ray Optics required detailed step-by-step options,” added Thorgule.
“The paper included 2 case research. Max Planck’s quantum concept case examine was comparatively easy whereas Galvanometer-related issues had been robust and required multi-step problem-solving and analytical considering,” added Extra.
“In contrast to earlier years, the five-mark questions this yr confirmed a transparent shift in direction of higher-order considering expertise. The numerical required in depth calculations with multi-step fixing. Time administration turned troublesome right here,” defined Shruti Gade of Siddhant Faculty, Sudumbre.
Who benefited and who struggled ?
“College students with sturdy conceptual understanding and follow in making use of ideas to real-world eventualities would have carried out nicely. Those that had completely coated NCERT examples and former yr’s questions discovered the derivations and case examine questions manageable.
Story continues beneath this advert
This paper clearly rewarded those that targeted on understanding relatively than memorizing,” stated Arvind Maske, a Nigdi-based Physics educator.
Whereas the paper maintained its average problem degree general, its emphasis on conceptual understanding and analytical considering marks a major shift in CBSE’s evaluation strategy. This might set a precedent for future examinations, suggesting that college students must deal with understanding ideas relatively than memorising options.