![Trump, Vance and Musk take intention on the courts as judges halt a few of 2nd time period agenda Trump, Vance and Musk take intention on the courts as judges halt a few of 2nd time period agenda](https://i0.wp.com/i.abcnewsfe.com/a/703248ad-9777-482c-ad8e-86f93fb254b2/donald-trump-34-gty-gmh-250207_1738962416684_hpMain_16x9.jpg?w=1024&ssl=1)
President Donald Trump and key members of his administration are lashing out at judges who’ve halted a few of his second-term agenda, suggesting they do not have the authority to query his government energy.
Up to now, the courts have pushed again on Trump’s makes an attempt to finish birthright citizenship, freeze federal grants, and the overhaul of federal companies like USAID and the Client Monetary Safety Bureau.
Over the weekend, the administration hit one other roadblock when a federal decide quickly restricted Elon Musk’s Division of Authorities Effectivity from accessing the Treasury Division’s huge federal cost system, which accommodates delicate info of tens of millions of Individuals.
Musk accused the decide of being “corrupt” and known as for him to be instantly impeached.
Vice President JD Vance, as he is carried out earlier than, questioned judicial oversight of the manager department. In an interview with ABC Information’ George Stephanopoulos final yr, Vance steered a president can ignore a courtroom’s order — even a Supreme Courtroom order — he considers illegitimate.
“If a decide tried to inform a normal methods to conduct a navy operation, that might be unlawful. If a decide tried to command the lawyer normal in methods to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that is additionally unlawful. Judges aren’t allowed to manage the manager’s respectable energy,” Vance mentioned over the weekend.
Trump was requested on Sunday about Vance’s feedback and a few of his setbacks in courtroom.
“When a president cannot search for fraud and waste and abuse, we do not have a rustic anymore,” Trump instructed reporters. “So, we’re very disillusioned, however with the judges that might make such a ruling. However we’ve got a protracted technique to go.”
“No decide ought to, frankly, be allowed to make that type of a choice,” the president added. “It is a shame.”
![](https://i0.wp.com/i.abcnewsfe.com/a/703248ad-9777-482c-ad8e-86f93fb254b2/donald-trump-34-gty-gmh-250207_1738962416684_hpMain.jpg?w=640&ssl=1)
President Donald Trump waves as he boards Air Pressure One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, Feb. 7, 2025.
Roberto Schmidt/AFP through Getty Photographs
Their pushback towards the judiciary comes as Trump and his allies assert a sweeping principle of presidential energy, one they are saying offers him sole management of the manager department. Authorized specialists instructed ABC Information they consider the Trump administration is making an attempt to arrange instances to check that principle earlier than the Supreme Courtroom.
Democrats say Trump is making an attempt to subvert checks and balances underneath the U.S. Structure, together with the function of Congress in setting the scope of federal companies and conducting oversight.
“I feel that is probably the most critical constitutional disaster the nation has confronted actually since Watergate,” Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy mentioned on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday. “The president is trying to grab management of energy, and for corrupt functions.”
California Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff responded on to Vance’s suggestion judges aren’t “allowed to manage” Trump’s government energy on X, writing: “JD, we each went to regulation college. However we do not have to be attorneys to know that ignoring courtroom selections we do not like places us on a harmful path to lawlessness.”
Republicans are largely aligned behind the president. Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton slammed the decide who blocked DOGE’s entry to Treasury knowledge as an “outlaw.” Rep. Jim Jordan, chairman of the Home Judiciary Committee, largely defended Musk’s actions as “finishing up the desire” of Trump on CNN on Sunday.
Michael Gerhardt, a constitutional regulation knowledgeable on the College of North Carolina, instructed ABC Information Trump’s rhetoric is basically “bravado” as “judges are entitled to overview the constitutionality of presidential actions.”
“The battle between the Trump administration and the courts isn’t just brewing; it’s more likely to persist all through his second time period,” Gerhardt mentioned, noting Trump has a protracted historical past of criticizing judges with whom he disagrees even when they had been appointed by Republican presidents.
“I feel this battle will outline Trump’s presidency,” Gerhardt added.