
Social media is a posh surroundings that presents each alternatives and threats for adolescents, with self-expression and emotional assist on the one hand and body-shaming, cyberbullying and addictive behaviors on the opposite. This complexity underscores the problem to regulating teen social media use, but it surely additionally factors to a different avenue for shielding younger folks on-line: how social media platforms are designed.
The rising debate round teen social media use has intensified, with latest bipartisan coverage efforts within the US, such because the Youngsters On-line Security Act, in search of to guard younger folks from digital harms. These efforts mirror authentic issues. Nevertheless, broad restrictions on social media might additionally restrict advantages for teenagers, throwing the child out with the bathtub water.
I’m a researcher who research on-line security and digital well-being. My latest work with colleagues in laptop scientist Pamela Wisniewski’s Socio-Technical Interplay Analysis Lab underscores a crucial level: social media is neither inherently dangerous nor totally helpful. It’s a device formed by its design, how teenagers use it, and the context of their experiences.
In different phrases, social media’s affect is formed by its affordances – how platforms are designed and what they allow customers to do or constrain them from doing. Some options foster connection whereas others amplify harms.
As society strikes towards sensible options for on-line security, you will need to use evidence-based analysis on how these options form teenagers’ social media experiences and the way they may very well be redesigned to be age acceptable for younger folks. It’s additionally necessary to include teenagers’ views to pinpoint what insurance policies and design decisions must be made to guard younger folks utilizing social media. My colleagues and I analyzed over 2,000 posts from teenagers ages 15-17 on an internet peer-support platform. Teenagers brazenly mentioned their experiences with standard social media platforms resembling Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat and TikTok.
Their voices spotlight a possible path ahead: specializing in security by design – an method that improves platform options to amplify advantages and mitigate harms. This method respects younger folks’s company whereas prioritizing their digital well-being.
What teenagers say about social media
Whereas social media’s worst outcomes resembling cyberbullying or psychological well being crises are sometimes within the highlight, our analysis reveals that teenagers’ experiences are way more nuanced. As an alternative, platforms allow various outcomes relying on their options and design.
Story continues under this advert
Teenagers generally described detrimental experiences involving social drama, cyberbullying and privateness violations. For instance, Instagram was a focus for body-shaming and vanity points, pushed by its emphasis on curated visible content material. Fb triggered complaints about privateness violations, resembling dad and mom sharing personal data with out teenagers’ consent. Snapchat, in the meantime, uncovered teenagers to dangerous interactions as a result of its ephemeral messaging, which fosters intimate however probably unsafe connections.
On the similar time, teenagers expressed that social media gives an area for assist, inspiration and self-expression, notably when offline areas really feel isolating. Teenagers used social media to deal with stress or hunt down uplifting content material. Platforms resembling Snapchat and WhatsApp had been key areas for in search of connection, enabling teenagers to construct relationships and discover emotional assist. Snapchat, specifically, was the go-to platform for fostering shut private connections, whereas YouTube empowered teenagers to advertise their creativity and id by sharing movies.
Many praised Instagram and Snapchat for offering inspiration, distraction or emotional aid throughout irritating occasions. Teenagers additionally used social media to hunt data, turning to YouTube and Twitter to be taught new issues, confirm data or troubleshoot technical issues.
These findings underscore a crucial perception: Platform design issues. Options resembling algorithms, privateness controls and content-sharing mechanisms straight form how teenagers expertise social media. These findings additional query the notion of social media as a purely detrimental pressure. As an alternative, teenagers’ experiences spotlight its twin nature: an area for each danger and alternative.
Story continues under this advert
Key to safer social media
The idea of affordances – design and options – helps clarify why teenagers’ experiences differ throughout platforms and gives a path towards safer design. For instance, Instagram’s affordances resembling picture sharing and algorithmic content material promotion amplify social comparability, resulting in body-shaming and vanity points. Snapchat’s affordances, resembling ephemeral messaging and visibility of “finest associates,” encourage private connections however can foster dangerous interactions. In the meantime, YouTube’s affordances, resembling simple content material creation and discovery, promote self-expression however can contribute to time-management struggles as a result of its limitless scroll design.
By understanding these platform-specific designs and options, it’s doable to mitigate dangers with out shedding the advantages. For instance, Fb might enable for acceptable ranges of parental oversight of youngster accounts whereas preserving privateness. Instagram might scale back algorithmic promotion of dangerous content material. And Snapchat might enhance security options.
This security by design method strikes past limiting entry to concentrate on bettering the platforms themselves. By thoughtfully redesigning social media options, tech firms can empower teenagers to make use of these instruments safely and meaningfully. Policymakers can concentrate on holding social media firms liable for their platforms’ affect, whereas concurrently selling the digital rights of teenagers to learn from social media use.
Name for security by design
It’s necessary for policymakers to acknowledge that social media’s dangers and rewards coexist. As an alternative of viewing social media as a monolith, nevertheless, policymakers can goal the options of social media platforms more than likely to trigger hurt.
Story continues under this advert
For instance, they may require platform firms to conduct security audits or disclose algorithmic dangers. These steps might encourage safer design with out limiting entry. By addressing platform affordances and adopting security by design, it’s doable to create digital areas that shield teenagers from hurt whereas preserving the connection, creativity and assist that social media permits. The instruments to construct a future the place teenagers can thrive are already accessible; they simply must be designed higher.