Following the Ranveer Allahbadia ‘obscene’ speech row, the IT Ministry may reply to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Data Know-how by subsequent week on the present authorized framework to manage on-line speech on social media platforms and the necessity to make additional modifications to them to “to convey such platforms beneath authorized scrutiny in order to safeguard the societal values and shield the dignity of ladies and kids,” The Indian Categorical has learnt.
In an inside communication ready by the ministry to formulate a response for the Committee, it has referenced the now revoked Part 66A of the Data Know-how Act, which was deemed “unconstitutional” by the Supreme Courtroom in 2015, this paper has learnt.
This is available in reference to the row that erupted over allegedly ‘obscene’ remarks made by on-line influencer Ranveer Allahbadia within the well-liked comedy present ‘India’s Obtained Latent’ hosted by Samay Raina. A number of FIRs have been filed towards Allahbadia and others throughout states over a comment that he made on mother and father getting intimate. He then filed a case within the Supreme Courtroom, requesting for clubbing all of the FIRs towards him.
Whereas the highest court docket has granted him interim reduction from arrest, it additionally got here down closely on him over his speech, noting that “nobody has the license to talk no matter they need towards the norms of society within the title of freedom of speech”.
Final week, the Standing Committee on IT additionally held a gathering on the problem, the place they referred to as for stringent measures to curb such speech on social media platforms. The IT Ministry is making ready a short observe to ship to the Committee by February 25.
The inner communication ready by the ministry famous the remarks made by the Supreme Courtroom towards Allahbadia, and ‘drew consideration’ to Part 66A of the IT Act.
“…consideration of the Ministry is drawn to the Part 66A of IT (Modification) Act, 2008 which was supposed to supply safety towards offensive or insulting message, speech or info made on-line by granting powers to the Authorities to make arrests in such circumstances of misuse of freedom of speech. The Part was nevertheless declared ‘Unconstitutional’ by the Hon’ble Supreme Courtroom within the case of Shreya Singhal Vs Union of India in 2015 citing the explanations that the mentioned Part didn’t fall inside the cheap exceptions of freedom of speech and expression,” the observe is learnt to have mentioned.
Story continues under this advert
The ministry will inform the Committee of the efficacy of current legal guidelines to take care of such circumstances and have to amend the prevailing legal guidelines/IT Act, 2000 “as a way to convey such platforms beneath authorized scrutiny in order to safeguard the societal values and shield the dignity of ladies and kids,” whereas adhering to the inventive expression and freedom of speech assured beneath Article 19 (1)(a) of the Structure.
Following the backlash towards speech made by Allahbadia, which has additionally drawn sharp criticism from the Supreme Courtroom, many digital rights activists stay involved over the potential of a heavy handed regulatory response from the federal government, which may additional curtail the liberty of expression.
The IT Ministry didn’t reply to a right away request for remark.
© The Indian Categorical Pvt Ltd
