The Supreme Court docket Tuesday refused to intervene with the Allahabad Excessive Court docket order asking the Archeological Survey of India (ASI) to undertake the whitewashing of the outside a part of the disputed mosque in Uttar Pradesh’s Sambhal, and to recuperate the bills incurred from the mosque committee.
“We’re not inclined to intervene with the impugned judgment,” a bench of Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar stated, dismissing the attraction.
Showing for the appellant Satish Kumar Agarwal, Advocate Barun Sinha contended that such permissions will create extra confusion.
The plea identified {that a} single decide of the Allahabad HC on March 12 directed ASI to finish the whitewashing, and declare the bills from the committee of administration of Jami Masjid, Sambhal. “The course to the Archeological Survey of India to recuperate incurred bills from the Committee of Administration of Jami Masjid Sambhal is prejudicial to the appropriate and curiosity of the Petitioner being a devotee of Hari Har Temple, Sambhal,” stated the plea.
Advocate Sinha submitted that ASI had sufficient funds to take up the whitewashing if it was actually wanted, however the court docket refused to intervene or concern any course.
On December 12, 2024, the Supreme Court docket barred civil courts throughout the nation from registering contemporary fits difficult the possession and title of anywhere of worship or ordering surveys of disputed spiritual locations till additional orders, and made it clear that no “efficient” orders could be handed.
Listening to a batch of six petitions difficult the constitutional validity of the Locations of Worship Act, 1991, a three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, stated then, “Because the matter is sub judice earlier than this Court docket, we deem it applicable to direct that, although contemporary fits could also be filed, no fits can be registered and no proceedings shall be undertaken therein until additional orders of this Court docket.”
Story continues beneath this advert
“Additional, within the pending fits, no Court docket will move any efficient interim orders or ultimate orders, together with orders directing surveys, and many others. until the subsequent date of listening to/additional orders of this Court docket,” the bench directed.
