It’s painful to listen to {that a} vice-chancellor, officers of the Nationwide Accreditation and Evaluation Council (NAAC), professors of prestigious establishments and office-bearers of an apparently “high-ranking” college have been arrested just lately for bribes allegedly given and brought in change for higher rankings. It’s doubly painful to see the system descending to the corruption that was as soon as eradicated.
Transparency and accountability have been introduced into the accreditation system nearly 13 years in the past. Full digitisation of each course of that started with the receiving of functions, processing them and importing deficiencies to producing the ultimate approval letters was a path-breaking transformation that led to nice institutional credibility. All interplay with the administration of the institutes was both curbed fully or stored to a minimal. All knowledgeable visits have been changed with on-line updating of information, with offline visits restricted to the addressing of complaints.
Story continues under this advert
Regulators have, by the character of their work, alternatives for corruption. Somebody breaks the rule and somebody is anticipated to deliver them to e book. That is both completed or not completed for a worth. The cycle is troublesome to interrupt when the stakes get increased. That stated, is corruption an financial phenomenon which is judged on moral grounds? AICTE, earlier than the reforms, was usually seen as steeped in systemic corruption that included conflicting incentives, discretionary and monopolistic powers, lack of transparency, and a tradition of impunity. These stemmed from weaknesses in due processes, which some establishments exploited. New processes have been developed with checks and balances and these have been hard-coded into an e-governance system. The AICTE had a big contingent of staff who have been on deputation, whereas the remainder have been entrenched within the previous methods. This mixture erased institutional reminiscence on the one hand and inspired impunity on the opposite. At AICTE, everybody on deputation was changed and the everlasting workers transferred. These selections got here at a worth, with threats each private {and professional}. In the present day, the AICTE and the Nationwide Board of Accreditation (NBA) take pleasure in a good diploma of credibility. The system continues to be not idiot proof and securing it towards corruption stays a piece in progress. Nevertheless, different regulatory companies, particularly within the training system, might nonetheless do effectively to study from AICTE’s expertise.
Is corruption restricted solely to authorities institutions? There are any variety of personal corporations that take pleasure in corruption. This isn’t a query of your corruption vs my corruption. The difficulty is an absence of values within the individuals who run the methods. That stated, the federal government — with transparency and good governance as its supreme tenets — should cleared the path to stop all types of corruption.
The strain to succeed immediately is immense. Expertise generally is a leveller. However it may well solely achieve this a lot. That’s why the reforms initiated greater than a decade in the past require follow-up immediately, particularly as a result of society locations a premium on training like by no means earlier than. Our training system has completed effectively to supply entrepreneurs, politicians, medical doctors, engineers, artists and actors. Even then, it’s time to re-imagine it by maintaining values in focus.
Story continues under this advert
At occasions, corruption is hidden in our societies. All events wish to hold their transactions secret. For some, it may very well be doing somebody “a pleasant flip”, for others it may very well be simply minor “misbehaviour”. Completely different individuals perceive corruption in a different way. Incidents of corruption result in requires reform. Nevertheless, reforms can solely consequence from paradigm shifts.
Tips on how to impact this paradigm shift within the training ecosystem? The realisation that corruption is unhealthy and have to be handled is an efficient place to begin. Second is to grasp the political economic system of the system. Companies like NAAC and NBA should realise that the stakes are excessive for the administration working these institutes. They increase the charges based mostly on higher rankings and therefore, they may do no matter it takes. In spite of everything, rankings translate into lots of of crores every admission 12 months, to not converse of the sale of so-called “administration seats”.
The NAAC’s proposed binary accreditation could also be a solution. Nevertheless, it tends to gloss over the finer features of high quality and places everybody at an equal drawback. There may be additionally the issue of visiting knowledgeable groups who’re anticipated to confirm the claims. This can be a large place to begin for corruption. Knowledge uploaded to the positioning immediately, verified by third events and legacy information, with discrepancies flagged immediately, is an thought price exploring. DigiLocker, a safe cloud-based platform for the storage, sharing and verification of paperwork and certificates, gives entry to genuine digital paperwork to the citizen’s digital doc pockets. Why not make it necessary for each institute to add all their paperwork, each tutorial and administrative, that can be utilized as major sources for verification?
The Mexican economist Angel Gurría, who was OECD secretary-general between 2016 and 2021, framed the issue aptly. “Integrity, transparency and the battle towards corruption must be a part of the tradition. They must be taught as elementary values,” he stated. By all accounts, particular person motion has proved inadequate to focus on systemic corruption. Consultants like Gurría have, due to this fact, emphasised collective motion. Nevertheless, regardless of the methodology, it is going to be naïve to anticipate that corruption will disappear from society. Our efforts have to be to rein it in and shield the weak. Holding the training system freed from controversy is a crucial pre-requisite for catering to the wants of an aspirational society. The prices of corruption are paid by the taxpayer. The prices of corruption within the training system are paid by the nation’s youth.
Corruption could also be as previous as human historical past. Nevertheless, regulatory heads and vice-chancellors ought to steer by instance. That may very well be the precursor to systemic change.
The author is former chairman, AICTE
