
A federal decide in New Hampshire is siding with an area college district in stopping dad and mom from sporting armbands on college property in help of organic girls-only sports activities.
In September, the dad and mom wore pink-colored “XX” wristbands throughout a highschool soccer sport the place transgender athlete Parker Tirrell, now 16, was enjoying on an opposing workforce. The wristbands referenced the intercourse chromosomes related to organic females.
The protest led to Bow and Dunbarton Faculty Districts Superintendent Marcy Kelley issuing a discover of trespass towards dad and mom Anthony and Nicole Foote, together with Kyle Fellers and Eldon Rash, in line with the New Hampshire Journal.

Parker Tirrell, a transgender athlete who performs on her highschool’s ladies’ soccer workforce, practices within the driveway of her household house on Friday, March 7, 2025 in Plymouth, New Hampshire. (AP Photograph/Charles Krupa)
TRUMP ADMIN EXECUTIVE ORDER BANNING TRANSGENDER PARTICIPATION IN WOMEN’S SPORTS JUST THE START, EXPERT SAYS
The dad and mom then sued the college district, claiming their First Modification rights had been violated. Whereas the no-trespass orders have since expired, they requested the decide to permit them to hold indicators and put on the wristbands that includes the image for feminine chromosomes in school occasions whereas the case proceeds.
On Monday, U.S. District Court docket Decide Steven McAuliffe, a President George H. W. Bush appointee, dominated that the district acted moderately in its choice to stop dad and mom from protesting.
McAuliffe stated the dad and mom’ “slim, plausibly inoffensive” intentions weren’t as essential as the broader context, and that adults attending a highschool athletic occasion don’t take pleasure in a First Modification-protected proper to convey messages that demean, harass or hurt college students.

Transgender athlete Parker Tirrell with a soccer ball.
“Whereas plaintiffs could very properly have by no means supposed to speak a demeaning or harassing message directed at Parker Tirrell or some other transgender college students, the symbols and posters they displayed had been absolutely able to conveying such a message,” he wrote. “And, that broader messaging is what the college authorities moderately understood and appropriately tried to stop.”
“The broader and extra demeaning/harassing message the Faculty District understood plaintiffs’ ‘XX’ symbols to convey was, in context, fully cheap,” wrote McAuliffe.
UNITED NATIONS HOLD PANEL ON FIGHTING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND GIRLS IN SPORTS
Fellers and Foote testified that they’d not supposed to harass or in any other case goal a transgender participant on the opposing workforce, however the college district stated in another way. The group of fogeys had additionally not protested at any earlier sport.
Within the days main as much as the sport, one other guardian instructed college officers that she had overheard others speak about exhibiting as much as the sport sporting clothes and heckling the transgender participant.
“After we suspect there’s some kind of menace . . . we don’t await it to occur,” Kelley stated beforehand.
In February, the dad and mom requested the court docket to rule that they be allowed to put on pink wristbands on the spring video games to protest transgender athletes competing in ladies’ sports activities. Their request for a preliminary injection was denied, and the court docket has but to rule on the request to put on the pink wristbands in any respect college sporting occasions, per the Harmony Monitor.

President Donald Trump indicators the No Males in Girls’s Sports activities Government Order into legislation within the East Room of the White Home in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 5, 2025. The order seeks to ban transgender women and girls from competing on sports activities groups that match their gender identification. (ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Del Kolde, a senior lawyer for the Institute for Free Speech and one of many attorneys representing the dad and mom, stated he strongly disagrees with the court docket’s opinion issued denying their request for a preliminary injunction.
“This was grownup speech in a restricted public discussion board, which enjoys larger First Modification safety than scholar speech within the classroom,” Kolde stated in a press release to the outlet. “Bow Faculty District officers had been clearly discriminating based mostly on viewpoint as a result of they perceived the XX wristbands to be ‘trans-exclusionary’.”
After the ruling was issued, the plaintiffs filed a discover saying they don’t intend to enter extra proof earlier than the decide makes a last choice.
The choice comes simply weeks after President Donald Trump signed an govt order supposed to ban transgender athletes from collaborating in ladies’ and ladies’s sports activities.
Fox Information’ Ryan Morik, Paulina Dedaj, Landon Mion, Jackson Thompson and The Related Press contributed to this report.