Custody battle between a legally separated couple over their 10-year-old son with particular wants had the Supreme Courtroom fuming on Wednesday and issuing a non-bailable warrant in opposition to the daddy for flying to New York, apparently to be with the kid, regardless that his passport is deposited with the highest court docket.
A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and P Okay Mishra requested Extra Solicitor Basic Okay M Nataraj to apprise it as to how he “was permitted to depart this nation and not using a passport and depart of this Courtroom”.
Senior Advocate Vikas Singh showing for the daddy Manish Chhokar tried to cause with the bench that with the mom additionally in India, there was a official concern of the Little one Protecting Companies (CPS) taking the boy and inserting him in foster care contemplating it a case of abandonment of the kid, however to no avail.
Singh stated that the daddy, a Inexperienced Card holder, “had performed all the pieces potential to switch the custody of the kid, and it was solely due to” the previous spouse’s “non-cooperation/ non-appearance within the Michigan Courtroom that the switch had not taken place”.
The counsel stated that the kid’s well being had began displaying indicators of degradation not too long ago and this nervous his second spouse who was caring for him. Anxious by the kid’s situation, she independently contacted the US Citizenship and Immigration Companies (USCIS) and utilized for an emergency Journey Doc for him. The Journey Doc was issued in favour of Manish Chhokar by USCIS on November 26, 2024.
The couple have been married in February 2006 and later moved to the US. Nonetheless, the couple had a marital discord and the husband obtained a divorce decree on September 9, 2017, from the Circuit Courtroom for the County of Oakland Household Division, Michigan, USA.
The woman had additionally initiated a number of proceedings in opposition to Chhokar in India, however a lot later a settlement was reached between the events earlier than the SC on October 21, 2019. One of many grounds for settlement was that he shall give the custody of the kid to the mom.
Story continues beneath this advert
When this didn’t occur, she initiated contempt of court docket proceedings in opposition to Chhokar. The SC framed fees in opposition to him on September 9, 2024.
In its order Wednesday, the SC stated Chhokar appeared earlier than it just about on December 13, 2022. It stated that by order dated January 17, 2024, he was requested to stay current within the Courtroom in all proceedings.
The bench added that earlier orders of the court docket on the matter “would point out there have been a number of makes an attempt to resolve the matter, because it was a matter of kid custody the place this Courtroom went out of its means in granting indulgence to the respondent (father) in hope that he would handover the kid to his mom and honour the phrases of his settlement, which have been part of the order of this Courtroom. All the identical, all efforts of this Courtroom went in useless.”
“On the final listening to of this matter i.e. 22.01.2025, the alleged contemnor/respondent was not current within the Courtroom which was in violation of the order of this Courtroom, when an announcement was made by MrVikas Singh, realized senior counsel representing him that he shall be current on the subsequent date of itemizing…Right this moment, we have now been knowledgeable by none different however the realized senior counsel Mr Vikas Singh…that the alleged contemnor/respondent had left for USA,” the court docket identified.
© The Indian Categorical Pvt Ltd
