A DAY after the Bombay Excessive Courtroom pulled up the state prison investigation division (CID) in reference to the Badlapur custodial dying case and requested a Mumbai Police SIT to probe the matter, CID is prone to method the Supreme Courtroom on Wednesday looking for the Bombay HC order be stayed.
Sources stated a workforce from the state CID had already reached Delhi on Tuesday and have been prone to file a particular depart petition (SLP) earlier than the Supreme Courtroom.
A CID official stated they’d method the SC looking for to remain the resolution of the Bombay Excessive Courtroom. The official stated they’d point out that the investigation was at a sophisticated stage they usually be allowed to proceed with the probe.
Extra Director Normal (ADG) CID Prashant Burde didn’t reply to queries from The Indian Specific.
Observing that “refusal to analyze will permit perpetrators to go unpunished”, the Bombay Excessive Courtroom on Monday constituted a Particular Investigation Crew (SIT) of Mumbai police to probe the custodial dying of an accused within the Badlapur sexual assault case.
A 23-year-old janitor, arrested in August 2024 for the alleged sexual assault of two minor ladies at a college in Badlapur in Thane district, was shot lifeless whereas he was being transported in a police automobile on September 23.
The HC noticed that the SIT can be supervised by Joint Commissioner of Police (Crime Department) Lakhmi Gautam and headed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Mumbai.
Story continues under this advert
The courtroom directed the state CID handy over all papers to the SIT inside two days and the SIT shall take applicable steps within the matter. It additionally requested the SIT to “make each endeavour to unearth the details and take the case to the logical finish” by conducting a probe pretty and impartially from all angles uninfluenced by anybody.
The Excessive Courtroom stated, “The case requires thorough investigation as it’s undisputed that the deceased succumbed to bullets fired by a police officer when he was in police custody.”
“The refusal to analyze against the law undermines the rule of regulation and erodes public religion in justice and permits perpetrators to go unpunished,” a bench of Justices Revati Mohite-Dere and Neela Ok Gokhale had stated.
