![Gujarat HC calls CRPF denying promotion to HIV+ staffer a ‘clear case of discrimination’ | Ahmedabad Information Gujarat HC calls CRPF denying promotion to HIV+ staffer a ‘clear case of discrimination’ | Ahmedabad Information](https://i0.wp.com/images.indianexpress.com/2025/02/guj-hc-2.jpg?w=1024&ssl=1)
The Central Reserve Police Power (CRPF) denying a feminine staffer promotion to a better put up as a result of she was contaminated with HIV-AIDS was a transparent occasion of discrimination, the Gujarat Excessive Courtroom famous on Wednesday.
A division bench of Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice Pranav Trivedi made the commentary whereas listening to a plea filed by the girl staffer of the CRPF who stated she was being denied promotion regardless of assembly different eligibility standards as a result of she was affected by HIV-AIDS.
The court docket directed that the matter be dropped at the discover of in-charge Further Solicitor Common of India and sought the regulation officer’s look earlier than it on the following date of listening to on March 6. The counsel showing for the respondents — the Union of India, CRPF and Commandant, CRPF — contended {that a} standing order was handed pursuant to the rule which stipulates {that a} candidate must be in “form one” for the aim of promotion.
“This case highlights clear cases of discrimination within the Central Reserve Police Power for the incumbents who’re affected by the illness generally known as HIV-AIDS,” the HC stated in its order.
The counsel for the petitioner contended the girl has been denied promotion constantly regardless of being match for elevation on all different facets of eligibility besides the truth that she is affected by the infectious illness which is progressing. The petitioner challenged the validity of the Standing Order Quantity 4/2008 in addition to Rule 5 of the CRPF Assistant Commandant (Ministerial), Recruitment Guidelines 2011, on the bottom the identical is contradictory to the provisions of HIV and AIDS (Prevention and Management) Act, 2017 and the Nationwide HIV Counselling and Testing Pointers 2024.
They have been additionally violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Structure because the petitioner was being denied promotion to a better ministerial put up solely on the idea of a call of the medical board dated February 3, 2024, reporting the petitioner was affected by increased grade of the illness, the court docket famous in its order.
© The Indian Specific Pvt Ltd