Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., grilled Kash Patel, President Donald Trump’s nominee to move the FBI, over Patel’s pro-gun stances.
Requested by Padilla if Patel believes background checks on firearm purchases are constitutional in the course of the nominee’s affirmation listening to Thursday, Patel responded that he didn’t know “the in-depths of it,” however believed “that’s what the Supreme Courtroom mentioned.”
“Do you assume civilian possession of machine weapons is protected by the Second Modification?” Padilla fired again.
EX-FBI OFFICIAL WHO SHUT DOWN HUNTER BIDEN LINES OF INVESTIGATION VIOLATED HATCH ACT WITH ANTI-TRUMP POSTS
“Regardless of the courts rule regarding the Second Modification is what’s protected by the Second Modification,” Patel responded.
Padilla defined that his line of questioning was resulting from an “affiliation” between Patel and the group Gun homeowners of America, which enthusiastically endorsed Trump’s alternative to guide the FBI.
“GOA Applauds Nomination of ‘Fiercely Professional-Gun’ Kash Patel for FBI Director,” the group mentioned in a press aid following Trump’s announcement to faucet Patel.
KASH PATEL, TRUMP’S PICK FOR FBI DIRECTOR, ANSWERS QUESTIONS ON JAN. 6 , QANON, AND MORE
Padilla expressed concern over the enthusiastic endorsement, arguing that the group has taken “excessive positions” on weapons.
“Gun Homeowners of America has taken excessive positions, together with the place that each one background checks are unconstitutional and that civilian possession of machine weapons is protected underneath the Second Modification,” Padilla mentioned.
Padilla then argued that Patel could be liable for overseeing a few of the nation’s most important gun laws on the FBI, expressing concern that Trump’s nominee was lower than the duty.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“Let me remind you that as FBI director you’ll oversee crucial tasks associated to firearm regulation, you’re administering the nationwide instantaneous prison background verify system. Sure, it’s constitutional, it’s in place, for a cause! You’d additionally regulate the distribution of machine weapons to forestall them from falling into the incorrect arms. Insurance policies and applications in place for a cause,” Padilla mentioned.
“Given your hesitancy, given your solutions, I’m involved about your means to do the job when it’s not in alignment with views like Gun Homeowners of America.”