Vice President Kamala Harris was confronted by MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle in regards to the Teamsters’ refusal to supply their endorsement to the Democratic nominee, the primary time it has carried out so in many years.
The key labor union group shocked the nation final week when it introduced it will not be making an endorsement within the presidential race whereas additionally revealing polling information that confirmed its members overwhelming backed former President Trump, who Ruhle famous “related” with union members on an emotional degree in 2016.
“When the Teamsters determined to not endorse you, what was their reasoning? What are they on the lookout for?” Ruhle requested.
Harris initially responded by pointing to the endorsements of different labor union teams she had obtained, telling Ruhle “I stand by staff and I stand by the significance of with the ability to be part of a union and to grasp the profit and the worth of unions.”
MSNBC’S STEPHANIE RUHLE CALLS OUT HARRIS FOR DODGING HOW SHE’D RAISE TAXES: ‘SHE DOESN’T ANSWER THE QUESTION’
Vice President Kamala Harris was pressed about why she hadn’t earned the endorsement of the Teamsters labor union throughout an interview with MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle. (Screenshot/MSNBC)
“However I am asking as a result of there’s this concept [that] we would like one thing extra from her. What’s it?” Ruhle interjected.
“Donald Trump made a complete lot of guarantees that he didn’t meet and one would argue broke,” Harris informed Ruhle earlier than accusing the previous president of outsourcing American jobs.
She later added, “So a part of the problem, and I do not disagree, nevertheless it’s a problem, gotta earn the vote of all people, is reminding folks of truth no matter what someone says in a small rally someplace. And I feel that is actually essential, and that is a part of what I am doing on this marketing campaign is to remind folks, identical to right here in Pittsburgh, of the fact of who has stood with union labor, who stands for American manufacturing, who stands for American jobs.”
MSNBC HOST DEFENDS HARRIS AVOIDING POLICY QUESTIONS: SHE’S ‘NOT RUNNING FOR PERFECT’
Teamsters Common President Sean O’Brien mentioned, “Neither main candidate was in a position to make critical commitments to our union to make sure the pursuits of working persons are all the time put earlier than Large Enterprise.
“We sought commitments from each Trump and Harris to not intrude in important union campaigns or core Teamsters industries — and to honor our members’ proper to strike — however have been unable to safe these pledges.”
Whereas Teamsters management shunned providing its help, information launched by the group confirmed that just about 60% of its rank and file members backed Trump whereas solely roughly a 3rd of them deliberate to vote for Harris.
Teamsters president Sean O’Brien shocked the nation when saying his labor union wouldn’t endorse Harris for president. (Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP through Getty Photographs)
In one other interview change, Ruhle pressed Harris on how she would “get the cash” to fund her formidable financial proposals if Republicans on Capitol Hill block her efforts to lift the company tax charge.
“Do you continue to go ahead with these plans and borrow?” Ruhle requested.
“However we’re gonna have to lift company taxes,” Harris responded. “We’re going to should be sure that the largest firms and billionaires pay their fair proportion. That’s simply it. It’s about paying their fair proportion.”
CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE
MSNBC’s Stephanie Ruhle pressed Harris on how she would “get the cash” to fund her formidable financial proposals. (Screenshot/MSNBC)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Ruhle later admitted that Harris “would not reply the query.”
“If the GOP is controlling the Senate, if she will be able to’t increase company taxes, the place is she going to get the cash from to increase the kid tax credit score and do no matter she needs to do. And she or he says, ‘we simply should do it,’” Ruhle informed her MSNBC colleague Nicolle Wallace. “That’s nice and that’s a marketing campaign promise, however the concern is, if it means we’re gonna simply borrow once more, then what we’re doing is we’re simply by no means addressing the deficit. And again within the days whenever you have been a proud Republican, money owed and deficits issues.”
