Check out the important ideas, phrases, quotes, or phenomena day-after-day and brush up your information. Right here’s your information nugget for immediately.
Information Nugget: Proper to Privateness
Topic: Polity
(Relevance: The appropriate to privateness has been a outstanding subject within the information, notably concerning digital rights and the increasing scope of basic rights. The united states has requested questions on it in prelims and primary exams. For example, a query in regards to the Proper to Privateness appeared within the 2021 Prelims and the 2017 Mains.)
Why within the information?
Justice KS Puttaswamy, former Karnataka Excessive Court docket decide and the lead petitioner within the seminal ‘proper to privateness case’, handed away on October twenty eighth, on the age of 98.
Justice Puttaswamy famously challenged the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme, which led to the Supreme Court docket recognising the appropriate to privateness underneath the elemental proper to life underneath Article 21 of the Structure.
Key Takeaways :
1. In August, 2017, a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court docket of India in Okay. Puttaswamy v Union of India Case dominated unanimously that “the appropriate to privateness is protected as an intrinsic a part of the appropriate to life and private liberty underneath Article 21 and as part of the freedoms assured by Half III of the Structure”.
2. There have been 22 petitioners in all however the lead petitioner who challenged Aadhaar was Justice KS Puttaswamy. The Supreme Court docket had addressed the problem of privateness in roughly 30 earlier judgments. Nevertheless, the Authorities of India argued on this case that privateness isn’t a basic proper, stating that this had been decided in two judgments made by an eight-judge and a six-judge Bench. Because of this, the matter was first referred to a five-judge Bench after which, to this nine-judge Bench.
3. Former Legal professional Common Okay Okay Venugopal had argued that “the appropriate of privateness might at greatest be a typical legislation proper, however [it was] not a basic proper assured by the Structure”. The courtroom mentioned that “infusing a proper with a constitutional component” offers it “a way of immunity from fashionable opinion and, as its reflection, from legislative annulment”, which a typical legislation proper wouldn’t have.
4. SC in its verdict rejected all arguments of the Union authorities, overruled the courtroom’s judgments in M P Sharma (1954) and Kharak Singh, and permitted the selections of its smaller Benches, which had discovered the appropriate to privateness implicit in the appropriate to life and private liberty.
5. The Proper to Privateness has emerged on the heart of varied controversies in recent times, but its specific definition stays unclear in lots of circumstances.
Alok Prasanna Kumar writes-
Three components are thought of because the core to the appropriate to privateness: Private autonomy, the liberty to make selections and the appropriate to find out what occurs with details about oneself.
6. Aishwarya Giridhar, Nidhi Singh write- “The SC has explored rules of autonomy, dignity, and identification in relation to privateness to strengthen the framework of constitutional rights. For example, it decriminalised all sexual relations between consenting adults, together with adults of the identical intercourse, counting on the appropriate to privateness linked with freedom of expression, equality, and non-discrimination…The Court docket additionally examined the position of privateness within the context of end-of-life care and reaffirmed the appropriate to die with dignity. Since Puttaswamy, the SC has deliberated on and expanded the ambit of the appropriate to privateness.”
BEYOND THE NUGGET: How is the appropriate to privateness protected in different nations?
7. United States: The U.S. Structure doesn’t explicitly point out the appropriate to privateness, the Supreme Court docket has interpreted varied amendments to suggest that this proper exists. Particularly, the Privateness Act of 1974 was enacted to guard residents from arbitrary use of their information by federal businesses. This legislation requires businesses to maintain a document of disclosures of the knowledge they preserve. Moreover, there’s a federal legislation that protects the privateness of Social Safety numbers from authorities inquiries, besides in circumstances the place details about tax funds should be disclosed or in circumstances associated to little one help
8. Germany: Germany’s horrific historical past underneath the Nazi regime, characterised by fixed authorities surveillance, has led the nation to be extraordinarily cautious about administrative intrusions into people’ private lives. Over time, Germans have labored to evolve and replace privateness legal guidelines to satisfy the social and technological wants of the time. Because of this, Germany has turn into one of many strictest nations by way of imposing privateness legal guidelines.
9. Sweden: Regardless of being one of many first nations of the world to offer a private identification quantity to its residents, required for use in each interplay with the State, Sweden can be one of many first nations to have an in depth statute on privateness legal guidelines on-line. The 1973 Information Act protected the privateness of non-public knowledge on computer systems. The appropriate to safety of non-public knowledge can be discovered within the Swedish structure.
10. Canada: The privateness legislation in Canada, first applied in 1977 as a part of the Canadian Human Rights Act, has advanced considerably over time. Initially, it was designed to function a way of knowledge safety. In 1983, the legislation was expanded to incorporate rules on how the federal government can entry and disclose private info.
11. European Union: Article 8 of the European Conference on Human Rights (ECHR) offers a proper to safety of 1’s personal and household life topic to sure restrictions. Additionally, the Information Safety Directive adopted by the European Union in 1995 regulates the processing of non-public knowledge throughout the European Union.
(Sources: Proper to privateness in different nations, A to Z of Privateness,)
On your queries and ideas write at roshni.yadav@indianexpress.com
Subscribe to our UPSC publication and keep up to date with the information cues from the previous week.
Keep up to date with the most recent UPSC articles by becoming a member of our Telegram channel – Indian Specific UPSC Hub, and observe us on Instagram and X.
