UPSC Subject at a Look is an initiative of UPSC Necessities to focus your prelims and mains examination preparation on a difficulty that has been within the information. Each Thursday, cowl a brand new matter in Q&A format and don’t miss MCQs in direction of the tip of the article. This week’s matter is the Part 6A and Citizenship. Let’s get began!
In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court docket upheld the constitutional validity of Part 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 on Thursday (October 17). This part grants citizenship to immigrants who entered Assam earlier than March 24, 1971. On this context, understanding the difficulty of citizenship in India from a broader perspective is essential.
UPSC has usually requested questions on citizenship and related points in numerous levels of examinations. As an illustration, within the UPSC CSE Prelims 2021, there was a query on citizenship. Additionally, present affairs matters which might be hitting the headline are related for essays and persona checks. Subsequently, it’s necessary to learn about citizenship, particularly with the current Supreme Court docket verdict on Part 6A of the Citizenship Act of 1955.
Preliminary Examination: Indian Polity and Governance- Structure, Political System, Panchayati Raj, Public Coverage, Rights Points.
Mains Examination: GS-II: Indian Structure—Historic Underpinnings, Evolution, Options, Amendments, Vital Provisions and Primary Construction.
Query 1: What are the constitutional provisions for citizenship in India?
Citizenship is a selected authorized relationship between a person and a state. It’s a authorized standing that grants an individual the best to reside in a rustic and to obtain safety from that nation. Citizenship additionally entails particular rights, obligations, and obligations that residents possess, however that non-citizens don’t.
In India, like in each different democratic nation, there are legal guidelines associated to citizenship. The Indian Structure accommodates articles that define the provisions for citizenship. The Structure establishes a single type of citizenship, referred to as nationwide citizenship, with out differentiating primarily based on states.
The time period “citizenship” is just not explicitly outlined within the Structure, however Articles 5-11 present the framework for citizenship on the time of the Structure’s graduation. These provisions define the strategies of buying citizenship, reminiscent of start, domicile, and descent, in addition to circumstances that disqualify people from acquiring Indian citizenship.
Article 5 particularly addresses citizenship on the outset of the Structure. It establishes a twin requirement for granting citizenship, which incorporates being “domiciled” in India and assembly one in every of three standards:
1. Being born in Indian territory,
2. Having no less than one father or mother born in Indian territory,
3. Being a resident of Indian territory for at least 5 consecutive years previous the Structure’s graduation.
Article 6 offers the provisions regarding the “Rights of citizenship of sure individuals who’ve migrated to India from Pakistan.” Whereby, Article 7 specified the Rights of citizenship of sure migrants, who migrated to the territory of Pakistan and returned to the territory of India after the nineteenth day of July 1948. Article 8 presents the “Rights of citizenship of sure individuals of Indian origin residing outdoors India.”
Article 9 explains that “Individuals voluntarily buying citizenship of a overseas State won’t be residents.” In accordance with it, no particular person shall be a citizen of India if they’ve voluntarily acquired the citizenship of any overseas State.
Article 10 discusses the “Continuance of the rights of citizenship.” Article 11 explains Parliament’s energy to make provisions relating to the acquisition and termination of citizenship and different associated issues.
Query 2: How does the Citizenship Act of 1955 govern the acquisition and lack of citizenship?
The constitutional provisions had been initially meant to outline citizenship on the graduation of the Structure. Nonetheless, the Citizenship Act of 1955 aimed to stipulate the substantive features of citizenship thereafter. It offers with issues regarding acquisition, willpower and termination of Indian citizenship after the graduation of the Structure.
Acquisition of Citizenship
In accordance with the act, Indian Citizenship will be acquired below any of the next provisions:
1. Citizenship by start (Part 3): In 1955, the legislation offered that anybody born in India on or after January 1, 1950, could be deemed a citizen by start. This was later amended to restrict citizenship by start to these born between January 1, 1950 and January 1, 1987.
Once more, it was amended by the Citizenship Modification Act, 2003. In accordance with it, these born after December 3, 2004, will probably be deemed a citizen of India by start if one father or mother is an Indian and the opposite is just not an unlawful immigrant.Thus, if one father or mother is an unlawful immigrant, the kid born after 2004 must purchase Indian citizenship by different means, not just by start. The legislation describes an unlawful migrant as a foreigner who:
(i) enters the nation with out legitimate journey paperwork, like a passport and visa, or
(ii) enters with legitimate paperwork, however stays past the permitted time interval.
2. Citizenship by descent (Part 4): An individual born outdoors India and who has no less than one Indian father or mother will probably be granted citizenship offered that the start is registered inside 1 yr with the Indian consulate within the jurisdiction.
3. Citizenship by registration (Part 5): That is for individuals associated to an Indian citizen by marriage or ancestry.
4. Citizenship by naturalisation (Part 6): In accordance with Part 6 of the Citizenship Act, a certificates of naturalisation will be granted to an individual who is just not an unlawful immigrant and has resided in India constantly for 12 months earlier than making an software. Moreover, within the 14 years earlier than the 12-month interval, the particular person will need to have lived in India for no less than 11 years.
Notably, the Citizenship Modification Act, 2019has diminished the interval of citizenship by naturalization for migrants belonging to the Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, or Christian communities from 11 years to 5. It additionally features a provision for granting citizenship to migrants belonging to those communities who entered India earlier than December 31, 2014, from Pakistan, Afghanistan, or Bangladesh. The CAA carves out an exception for tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram or Tripura as included within the Sixth Schedule to the Structure and the world coated below “The Internal Line.”
5. Citizenship by incorporation of territory (Part 7): Part 7 of the Citizenship Act of 1955 addresses citizenship by incorporation of territory. Which means that when a territory turns into a part of India, the Central Authorities has the authority to grant citizenship to people primarily based on their connection to that territory.
Termination of Citizenship
The Citizenship Act of 1955 contains provisions relating to the termination of citizenship. For instance, Part 8 offers with the Renunciation of citizenship; Part 9 covers the Termination of citizenship; and Part 10 explains the premise of “Deprivation of citizenship”.
Query 3: What’s Part 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, and the way was it launched following the Assam Accord of 1985?
Assam Accord was signed on August 15, 1985 by the Governments of India and Assam, the All Assam College students’ Union and the All Assam Gana Sangram Parishad in New Delhi. It got here on the finish of a six-year mass motion, spearheaded by college students, towards unlawful migration from East Pakistan/Bangladesh and aimed to safeguard Assam’s wealthy cultural, linguistic, and social identification.
A key factor of the Assam Accord was figuring out who was a foreigner within the state. Clause 5 of the Assam Accord states that January 1, 1966 shall function the bottom closing date for the detection and deletion of “foreigners” nevertheless it additionally accommodates provisions for the regularisation of those that arrived within the state after that date and up until March 24, 1971. Right here, we see that Part 6A was launched within the Citizenship Act of 1955 to offer authorized impact to Clause 5 of the Assam Accord.
Part 6A grants citizenship to anybody who entered Assam from Bangladesh earlier than January 1, 1966. It additionally recognises those that arrived between January 1, 1966, and March 24, 1971, as Indian residents, however with out voting rights for 10 years. Solely immigrants who entered illegally after March 25, 1971, are thought-about unlawful and ineligible for citizenship.
Query 4: Why was Part 6A challenged within the Supreme Court docket and what’s the current Supreme Court docket verdict on it?
Part 6A was contested on the grounds that it violates constitutional provisions on citizenship and goes towards the Proper to Equality by setting a special yardstick for Assam in comparison with the remainder of the nation. The petitioners had additionally alleged that by permitting migration, the clause hurts the flexibility of Assam’s “indigenous communities to guard their tradition” — and that it, due to this fact, violates Article 29 of the Structure. In its over 400-page lengthy verdict, the SC has engaged with all these arguments.
Supreme Court docket verdict on Part 6A
The Supreme Court docket in its verdict upheld the constitutional validity of Part 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 and referred to as for stricter implementation of legal guidelines towards unlawful immigration and judicial monitoring of the implementation of immigration and citizenship legislations.
Whereas Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices Surya Kant, M M Sundresh, and Manoj Misra upheld the constitutional validity, Justice J B Pardiwala dissented.
CJI Chandrachud stated that Part 6A is just not violative of Articles 6 and seven of the Structure, which prescribe a closing date for conferring citizenship for migrants from East and West Pakistan on the “graduation of the Structure”, that’s January 26, 1950.
“Legislative goal of Part 6A was to steadiness the humanitarian wants of migrants of Indian origin and the impression of the migration on the financial and cultural wants of Indian States,” stated CJI Chandrachud.
Justice Surya Kant and Justices M M Sundresh and Manoj Misra, stated, “Part 6A falls inside the bounds of the Structure and doesn’t contravene the foundational rules of fraternity, nor does it infringe upon Articles 6 and seven, Article 9, Article 14, Article 21, Article 29, Article 326, or Article 355 of the Structure of India.”
Specific view: SC verdict on Part 6A shifts citizenship debate to a broader floor
The SC verdict takes a liberal and expansive view of citizenship. CJI Chandrachud units the tone by observing that “challenges relating to the constitutionality of a statute require the Court docket to take a versatile method ”. Part 6 A, as he and three of his colleagues on the bench observe, was the legislative corollary to the Assam Accord. The duty earlier than the lawmakers was to steadiness “the humanitarian wants of migrants of Indian origin and its impression on financial and cultural wants of Indian states”.
The SC has endorsed the closing date for assembly this crucial. It held the March 25, 1971 cut-off rational on two grounds. One, The Unlawful Migrants (Willpower by Tribunals) Act, 1983 units this lower off. Furthermore, the Pakistani Military launched Operation Search Mild to curb the nationalist motion in East Pakistan on today. “The migrants earlier than the operation,” CJI Chandrachud says, “had been thought-about to be migrants of Partition in direction of which India had a liberal coverage”.
The petitioners argued that the Structure “upholds nationwide fraternity, not international fraternity”. In an necessary part of the decision, Justice Surya Kant goes into Constitutional Meeting debates to reach at a broader view of this precept. “Within the Indian constitutional context, fraternity assumes an inclusive position, aligning with the broader objectives of social justice,” he factors out. He phrases the petitioner’s view “restrictive” — “it permits them to decide on their neighbour” — and says its runs “opposite to the ethos envisaged by the Constituent Meeting”.
The Court docket’s “dynamic” studying of citizenship that’s delicate to the imperatives of “equality and upliftment” is critical at a time when debates over setting the parameters of Indian nationalism proceed to rage.
Submit Learn Questions:
(1) Just about India, think about the next statements: (UPSC CSE 2021)
1. There is just one citizenship and one domicile.
2. A citizen by start solely can turn out to be the Head of State.
3. A foreigner as soon as granted citizenship can’t be disadvantaged of it below any circumstances.
Which of the statements given above is/are appropriate?
(a) 1 solely
(b) 2 solely
(c) 1 and three solely
(d) 2 and three solely
(2) Just about the citizenship of India, think about the next statements:
1. The provisions associated to the citizenship had been enforce earlier than the Structure of India got here into impact.
2. The time period citizenship is explicitly outlined within the Structure.
Which of the assertion(s) given above is/are appropriate?
(a) 1 solely
(b) 2 solely
(c) Each 1 and a pair of
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
(3) On the graduation of this Structure, each particular person shall be a citizen of India who has his domicile within the territory of India and:
1. An individual has migrated on or after the nineteenth day of July 1948
2. Whose grand-parents had been born in India as outlined within the Authorities of India Act, 1935
3. Who was born within the territory of India
4. Both of whose dad and mom had been born within the territory of India
5. Who has been ordinarily resident within the territory of India for not lower than 5 years
Choose the right reply utilizing the codes given under:
(a) 1, 2, 4 and 5 solely
(b) 2, 3 and 5 solely
(c) 3, 4 and 5 solely
(d) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
(4) Contemplate the next statements in regards to the Treaty of Yandabo:
1. It marked the start of British rule in Assam.
2. The British seen Assam as a frontier and inspired large-scale immigration.
Which of the statements given above is/usually are not appropriate?
(a) 1 solely
(b) 2 solely
(c) Each 1 and a pair of
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
(Sources: Structure of India, What’s Citizenship Modification Act?, CAA, The historical past of immigration in Assam, In a 4:1 majority ruling, Supreme Court docket upheld constitutional validity of Part 6A, SC upholds Part 6A of Citizenship Act)
To your queries and recommendations write at roshni.yadav@indianexpress.com
🚨 The Indian Specific UPSC Necessities brings to you the October situation of its month-to-month journal. Click on Right here to learn. Share your views and recommendations within the remark field or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨
Subscribe to our UPSC e-newsletter and keep up to date with the information cues from the previous week.
Keep up to date with the newest UPSC articles by becoming a member of our Telegram channel – Indian Specific UPSC Hub, and observe us on Instagram and X.
